Just so you’ll know, goldbux, every time I see one of your clever little formulae, I am compelled to solve it.
(Yikes! Did I just admit that???)
Thanks for tracking them, I think.
Also glad that someone else is reading all the posts on these threads.
I might alternate to using an element's atomic number.
This time I landed on 98.
If I were confident of landing there, I could have posted "In at Californium."
The equivalent of "In < 10^2" would be "In < Fermium," or even better, "In < Einsteinium [ ~ In < 10^2 - 1 ]."
Looking forward to a decisive victory for President Trump on Tuesday!
I reckon he will win with > Magnesium * Cobalt [ ~ Mg * Co ] electoral votes.