There are enough gaps between bones that an object could be inserted in several places and not break bones..where the bones could move apart to accept a nail, even a large one such as was used for crucifixions.
The nails found could belong to anybody. Jesus would have dna from his mother but would have an unknown father since Joseph was not his blood father. A dna sample from any other person would have dna from 2 human parents.
Ron Wyatt claims to have found the Arc of the covenant in a series of sealed off tunnels below ground. One of them was beneath the crucifixion site where, Wyatt claims, the blood of Jesus trickeled to the mercy seat atop the arc.
Is it true? I don’t know. Is the shroud of turin an image of Jesus containing his blood? I don’t know. Are these the nails that pierced Jesus? I don’t know. None of us knows. Many have only opinions.
If they are true, wouldn’t blood samples and mDna be the same in all of the samples?
Has anybody dug up this supposed arc? Not that I’ve heard.
It would seem to me that when Jesus ascended into heaven, that he took his flesh with him. He is said to be flesh and bone, not blood, flesh and bone.
When we are resurrected, I don’t think there will be pieces and parts of us left behind. Likeeise, I think Jesus took all of his parts with him.
But all we have is conjecture and opinion.
In the end, there will be no doubts as truth will reign supreme.
Ron Wyatt claims to have found the Arc of the covenant in a series of sealed off tunnels below ground.
—
I think that part is controlled by the Waqf and no one but “Palestinians” can enter - they were also digging out many of the tunnels sand throwing the finds on a rubbish pile - don’t know it they were the same tunnels