Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Zhang Fei

“A strong party system would have strangled Trump’s presidential bid in the cradle.”

As I recall, they tried. Didn’t work. They sold out to Hilliary and it backfired.


11 posted on 10/15/2020 4:11:00 PM PDT by calenel (Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant. Join the war effort. On the human side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: calenel

[As I recall, they tried. Didn’t work. They sold out to Hilliary and it backfired.]


A strong party system means Trump would not have been able to run for the nomination at all. Candidates would have been selected by party honchos in smoke-filled rooms. Prior to 20th century reforms, the popular vote in each state played no part in the nominating process. In Europe, that’s still how the process works - party leaders decide who gets to run:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_election#United_States
[The United States is one of the few countries to select candidates through popular vote in a primary election system;[10] most countries rely on party leaders or paid up party members to select candidates, as was previously the case in the U.S.[]


16 posted on 10/15/2020 4:20:50 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson