[God luvs America]

I agree its always good to play from behind and not just blow these polls off but people get crazed. The person who started the thread made the asinine claim “Trump has no path without PA,” but lets look at the numbers:

In 2016 Trump had 306 EV, 40 more than necessary.

Pa (20), Mi (16), Wisconsin (10) account for 46 EV- which means if he carries all the states he won in 2016 all he needs is one of the above.

There also talk Nevada (6 ev) and Minnesota (10 ev) are now in play for the President.

[nathanbedford]

Your arithmetic is correct, there are clearly enough states without Pennsylvania, but all of these Midwestern states will tend to go together and, anyway, the odds lengthen considerably.

But your etiquette is far from correct, you should give a heads up to the person you mention in your reply, especially when your reply carries criticism of him.