[The Toddler]

The reply post flipped the verbiage from the original post, ie the person was justified in being hit, that got him angry.

You have a problem with reading comprehension. I flipped nothing. What I replied was what I said the first time.

[smileyface]

“You have a problem with reading comprehension. I flipped nothing. What I replied was what I said the first time.”
``````````````````````````
Original post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3889724/posts?page=1511#1505
“As a matter of fact it is very beneficial to boys to get hit in the mouth and to have hit someone in anger, it shapes masculinity and it identifies who is who;”

Reply post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3889724/posts?page=1515#1515
“You ever hit someone? If you did it should have been done in anger. You don’t hit them because you are angry. You hit them because they did something that justifies hitting them. That makes you angry.

Top: Hit someone in anger (ie anger first, then hit)
Bottom: Justified hitting, makes you angry. (ie hitting first, then anger)

Words mean things, as does the order in which they are phrased.