https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjkxXAeX0AQvwlq?format=jpg&name=900x900
Posted on 10/02/2020 12:08:13 AM PDT by ransomnote
Oh, man! Creepy Joe Biden.
Great post.
Probably will have to re-read it tonight.
Thinking that it’s good to keep my powder dry until after the election.
Perhaps just another "arrow in the quiver" per the Speaker of the House, or yet another Strzok-inspired "insurance policy" to stifle DJT-POTUS.
The WH should shut down the daily briefings until the sick reporters disclose who they are and submit to the same humiliating “tracing” as the rest of us. Eff them!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Absolutely should happen. The jackalmaggots go after Trump, his associates, supporters and all Rs like evil proctologists, and their own they protect like Fort Knox. The tables must be turned (kicked over!).
Mark
In my opinion, yes. Or at least attendees that sat near the front at the SCOTUS nomination event.
POTUS says he feels better than he has in 20 years:
October 2000: USSCole was attacked.
Listening, thank you.
I thought (watching the live feed on RSBN yesterday) “What interesting timing!!!”
Look at the following video and pay attention to the following time stamps (Keeping in mind that these people didn’t know what time or if POTUS Trump would appear):
51 min 20 sec Prayer
56 min 20 sec End Prayer
56 min 45 sec Amazing Grace
58 min 05 sec 1st car of Motorcade
58 min 17 sec POTUS Trump in the “Beast”
58 min 20 sec End song
There are no coincidences!!!!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjkxXAeX0AQvwlq?format=jpg&name=900x900
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., announced on Monday that he will not seek reelection to his Senate seat in 2022 and that he will not run for Pennsylvania governor that year either.
The announcement means that Pennsylvania Republicans will not have their most high-profile politician on any statewide ballot during the 2022 midterms in the critical swing state. Toomey had previously expressed interest in running for governor and was considered the odds-on favorite to be the Republican gubernatorial nominee in 2022 if he chose to run for the office.
“I will not be running for reelection in 2022 and I will not be running for governor,” Toomey said. “I will serve out the remainder of my term.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/toomey-announces-2022-governor-senate
Rick Grenell for C_A Director! Easy choice. May be too little, too late with the clock running out. It would be a very pleasant October surprise, however.
Yes, there were quite a few. Some very, very odd.
A woman waving a large, American flag at a conservative protest in Portland, Ore. on Sunday was attacked by Antifa militants who tried to steal her flag, then pulled her to the ground by her hair. The woman would not let go of the flag, and when Antifa couldn’t get it away from her, they assaulted her.
Thank you.
Hey Joe:
How does a woman get pulled to the ground by her hair by an "idea"?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We don’t know their names. They are being protected for some reason.
My question is: Why were these 3 reporters close enough to Trumps team to be exposed WITH them?
Which led me to the following possiblity: Could the reason the 3 reporters are being protected have more to do with being useful to the Trump admin. As their "inside baseball" people feeding our side useful info.?
It’s time to hate them back:
https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2020/10/04/its-time-to-hate-them-back-n2577416
I believe I understood the masculine frustration on display. It is in fact my experience working with men which told me not to write “I know you’re expressing frustration and really don’t intend your words to sound quite like....” because men, in my experience, are likely to “double down” if that is attempted.
Theirs are usually statements of resolve and for ME to couch their statements as frustration would be taken as a kind of patronizing or diminishment (you don’t MEAN what you say). Hence the double down strategem is likely.
As odd as it sounds, some like to target Q threads by claiming I personally believe this or that statement written by others on the Q thread. I have learned to rebut now on thread that which I would like to avoid having to rebut later on other threads. They don’t “get” that we don’t have leaders and some, like the MSM, are just going to nominate people and them flog them to fill that void.
So, I needed to state my opinions in a way that would not diminish the statement of resolves seen on thread, would clarify that those are personal views not expoused by Q or Q+, try to keep the welcome mat out for visitors who don’t know what Q does/does not endorse but have heard “things” from the media, and try to fulfill our thread’s commitment to meeting FR standards of conduct (not exposing FR to attacks by MSM or other when possible).
You said: “I’m sorry to have to tell you this but a lot of the fault lies with women who won’t let boys be boys.”
Don’t worry - your statement doesn’t apply to me. This isn’t about letting boys be boys - I’ve stated how I addressed my concerns above. I’ve never thought masculinity toxic; I am in fact quite a fan of it.
But, I post Q threads and sometimes I feel the need to get clarification to avoid problems later. Not saying it’s pleasant for anyone, but housekeeping piles up if you don’t keep up on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.