Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi; magglepuss

I am interested.

It seemed like it was Aus/NZ without further info, as these arrests of people publicly singing hymns in the US and being arrested are hard to believe.

The tasing on the bleachers looked bad, but where was it? Why was she being charged? Was she being charged with something that happened just before the vid started? I have been duped before by twit news vids; without more info, I don’t always respond, or dig deeper, as I suspect more info will be forthcoming.

Are you in Idaho?


1,584 posted on 09/26/2020 12:39:29 PM PDT by smileyface ("The illuminati's whole philosophy demands the use, abuse, sacrifice and consumption of children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1564 | View Replies ]


To: smileyface

Here is a newscast of the bleacher video It says in the newscast it was because she wasn’t wearing a mask.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6S17AEci08

The christians were not in Aus/NZ but in Moscow Idaho.

This has been going on for awhile. Didn’t you see the Dallas salon owner was arrested for going to work? Or the gym owner for going to work, or the barber for going to work. How about the folks who were arrested for writing on a public sidewalk in chalk in front of a planned parenthood. Or the guy who had to flee protesters trying to pull him out of his car, and got arrested. How about the guy who used a pellet gun on a thief on his property stealing his Trump sign. He got arrested, the thief did not.

What these police officers are doing is illegal. There is no such thing as just following orders. I have never, nor do I know anyone who has ever committed a crime because their boss told them to. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and it is illegal for police officers to violate someone’s civil rights. That means all of their rights, not just the 2nd. It doesn’t matter the color of ones skin, or how unsympathetic the victim may be. We either 100% believe in the Constitution or we don’t.

Currently, police have qualified immunity. In other words, if they make a mistake and get sued, the police dept. must pay restitution. Or, in other words, the taxpayer. QI is necessary to protect police from being expected to know every nuance in the law. HOWEVER, if a police officer willingly violates someones Constitution right, he/she should pay it himself. Threat of losing ones job is really not enough, because we don’t know if they will actually be fired or not from a corrupt police force.

Just like threat of arrest makes people comply, threat of losing ones qualified immunity should work as well.

It would not take to many police officers having to pay out 40 to 50k for this nonsense to stop.


1,609 posted on 09/27/2020 9:19:31 AM PDT by magglepuss (if Q support is good enough for POTUS, it should be good enough for FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson