“Is Trutherism still banned on FR?”
A better question might be “is truth banned?” or “do we have to accept official narratives without question?”. I sense the answer to both of those is negative. I could be wrong. Why is banning disccussion your first reaction?
Banning "truth" is not my "first reaction". That ban has been in place for years, I was wondering it that was still the case. If you don't like it, take it up with the owner of the site.
You say Trump is a builder. That is not strictly true. He is a real estate developer. There's an important difference. He's not an engineer. He hires engineers directly or under contract to design his projects.
He claimed "half of the columns were blown out" in the 1993 attack. That couldn't be true because the building didn't come down. Certainly there was damage to some of the columns, but half "blown out"? That doesn't seem to be the case.
Yes, he had questions about what really happened on 9/11. Everybody did, especially on the day of the attack.
Concering the funding for the study you linked to...
Who cares?
I missed the funding information that is provided in the report. I apologize for that. It was funded by "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" for $316K. I was primarily focused on the conclusions at the end.
Actually, that information is critically important. The study was apparently commissioned and conducted to advance a specific pre-determined conclusion, and in doing so, to disprove all others.
Considering the amount of fraud that exists in the scientific community concerning claims of "climate change", I would question the independence and motivation of the three people who did this study.
Follow the money.