Here it is condensed (from another site):
“To be eligible for Best Picture, films must meet any TWO of the following FOUR criteria.
1. ON-SCREEN REPRESENTATION
This standard can be met by fulfilling any ONE of these:
Lead actor or significant supporting actor from an ethnic minority group
At least 30 per cent of smaller roles are played by women, LGBT people, disabled people or ethnic minorities
The main storyline is centered on an under-represented group
2. CREATIVE LEADERSHIP
This standard can be met by fulfilling any ONE of these:
At least two senior creative posts, such as casting director, make-up artist or producer, are from an under-represented group including women
At least six smaller roles in the crew are filled by ethnic minorities
At least 30 per cent of the film’s total crew is from an under-represented group
3. INDUSTRY ACCESS
This standard can be met by fulfilling BOTH of these:
Studios and distributors must have paid interns or apprentices who are women or come from minority groups
Training opportunities must be offered to under-represented groups in production, distribution and financing
4. AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT
This standard can be met by fulfilling this ONE requirement:
Multiple senior executives in publicity, marketing and distribution are women or minority groups
That reads like an old Boy Scout Merit Badge set of requirements.
“At least 30 per cent of the film’s total crew is from an under-represented group”
Hmmmm. If 51 per cent of the film’s total crew is from an under-represented group, are they now the racist majority?
Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth from these nuts if the government tried to dictate what was acceptable or required in their films? Didn’t the prior generations work hard to get around and then abolish the film code office?
I sure the quality of the new films meeting these requirements will be on a par with Soviet Socialist art, i.e., unwatchable, politically preachy dreck.