I told you I would engage you as long as there are no ad hominems.
-PJ
‘will get you funny looks’ ... that was you after asserting that the poster was not using the proper definition of two terms. I’d say you like sneaky ad hom so you can claim you are above ad homs.
I told you I would engage you as long as there are no ad hominems.
Well, I'm sorry, but I don't know what else to think!
You're behaving in a manner that can only be described as being obtuse (slow to understand).
You claim I'm trying to twist words yet you've twisted words beyond recognition and even when I show proof of what you've done you go right back and use the words in the same twisted manner in which you had before.
Care to address my Puerto Rico example? Would those new electoral votes be appointed to the new State in accord to the Constitution and United State Code?
I guess we'll get to see if you are or aren't being intentionally obtuse.