Sure. Particle-ists believe there’s something called an “electron”.
They also believe that electrons “flow” along an electric current.
Now take a simple “electron gun” experiment in a pressure chamber, and vary the pressure inside.
If electrons are genuinely moving from cathode to anode, then increased pressure should result in decreased current, as the greater density should intercept more moving electrons. Maximum current should occur in a vacuum, with no atoms to intercept the allegedly moving electrons.
Go look it up, that’s exactly how electron guns are supposed to work - don’t take my word for it.
Except there’s a problem when you try to verify this with experiment. When you lower the pressure, the electric current DECREASES. In vacuum the current goes to zero.
The opposite should happen if particle theory is true.
Furthermore, when you try to nail them down on what exactly an electron is, they instantly go to the impossible “wave-particle duality” so they can pick and choose which set of rules they want to use to explain events, in defiance of those rules contradicting each other. And an electron instead of being a distinct particle becomes a “cloud” of probable positions.
They can’t prove any of that and the simplest experiment with an electron gun blows the hell out of the theory.
Your physics is 150 years out of date!
“Furthermore, when you try to nail them down on what exactly an electron is, they instantly go to the impossible “wave-particle duality””
LOL! Then you can’t. call them particle-ists!
“Except there’s a problem when you try to verify this with experiment. When you lower the pressure, the electric current DECREASES. In vacuum the current goes to zero.”
LOL! You should then call them anti-vacuum tubes?