Replies

TheLastRefuge

Follow @TheLastRefuge2

1.) Allow me to retort a thread to this specific account.

Everything claimed by this account, and any twitter account holder who advances the same prepositions as this account, are so brutally false and misguided it could only take an intentional effort to be this wrong.

Glad I never emailed or had substantive DM's with Sundance!
Seems he is going scorched earth because investigations did not support his theories. That is what happens when you abandon facts to pursue imaginary crimes by your imaginary bad guys. You miss the real ones going down! pic.twitter.com/TJuSSDjb2v
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) August 18, 2020

2.) The investigative agents, those who most people put their faith upon, are hampered by compartmentalized isolation of evidence. The system is purposefully set up that way.

Evidence is essentially silo'd.

3.) Those who understand my efforts understand the objective when cast against the reality of silo'd and compartmentalized evidence.

4.) The DOJ team, which includes investigative units who transition evidence from investigative use into actionable DOJ assemblies, do not track successfully across known firewalls....

5.) The Durham probe (for lack of a more authentic descriptive) do not communicate w/The Hill.

Ex. HPSCI does not communicate w/Durham; at least they do not successfully communicate.

In part this is because the receiver would be accepting the political intents of the evidence.

6.) Politics creates a compartmented information flow.

Information, even valid evidence that would be useful for investigators, becomes useless when retrieved or originated from political entities.

7.) The result is actual Durham/Barr investigators do not know where most of the explosive evidence is located. This includes any documents that originate from inside this complemented process.

8.) As a result of this convoluted process; the Durham team knows little about any evidence their internal unit did not independently create.

This system design helps the compartmented and corrupt to escape accountability.

9.) Durham investigators therefore do not have a handle over the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments - some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

10.) Previously both Senate and House staff admitted this was the fundamental flaw in their own investigations.

Additionally, this factual/structural flaw was confirmed to me today by the Durham investigative unit. [Read #8 Again]

11) Repeat: Durham investigators do not have a handle on the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments - some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

12) When you understand that, you understand what I am doing.

I have extracted and collated evidence from inside each compartment; then assemble and deliver to the investigative unit in such a manner as the political toxicity is removed.

13.) Today they saw evidence for the first time that was never assembled. You would be stunned at what they do not know, because the institutional and political compartmentalization blocks the investigative use.

14.) There is no grand investigative plan. There is no bigger investigative design... because the quest to provenance evidence, the demanded process itself, must be self-originated.

15.) Example: judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-…

Despite this coming from FISC to AG Barr and into Senate Judiciary Committee; Durham team unaware of the letter dated July 12, 2018.

16.) As a result... customary DOJ investigations can continue (ad infinitum) and yet will not result in substantive action prior to the election.

That's where public questioning of investigative practices, and specific details, forces an investigative shift.

In my never very humble opinion, none of what Sundance has dug up is every going to have any impact. Other than to his fanboys of course. Things will follow the course they will follow, which may well mean the guilty are not held to account and punishments do not fit the crime. Such has life always been.

Yeah, I summarized that 16-point treatise in one sentence in my post #48: "He fingered (not in the Biden sense) the Durham investigator, he claims it's FBI mope William Aldenberg and seems to be saying that nobody is connecting the dots and there is no Durham justice coming."

Sundance is BEYOND longwinded.

This is an incomprehensible mess. Is the writer prone to drunk posting?