[bagster]

The fact he identified the wacky parts attributed to Q (pedivores, etc.)

Just because you can't conceive of a thing, doesn't make it wacky.

Some of the things that Q has pointed to are hard to stomach and seemingly inconceivable.

That doesn't make it not true. Especially when so much evidence points to the probability that it is.

Lets try to be intellectually honest, here.

I will concede that there are those who 'interpret' Q and get it way wrong. Those voices are usually shouted down by the 'hive mind' or ignored. But you're right that the derps take those whack interpretations and use them to dismiss the entire thing as whack.

And some of those 'interpreters' may indeed be agents for the other wide.

There may even be agents for the other side registered on Free Republic trying to discredit the Q movement.

I have seen some very bad thinking here, when it comes to Q.

It is, after all, very dangerous to the derp state.

[epluribus_2]

We do the best we can with the information that surfaces. More is unknown than known when it comes to the anti-Trump jihaad. In the end logic and strong or weak arguments can only go so far and we rely on our gut reactions. I respect other points of views here on FR from 1999 on and agree with your reply as just as plausible than my model.

If there had not been a stained blue dress, The National Enquirer would have been laughed out of the echo chambers and Bill’s sick behavior would have been missed or forgotten.