Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wissa
But that doesn't say though that tariffs rising from 5% at the start of the country to 40% in the 1800's wasn't more beneficial to some regions and financially harmful to others.

The tariff was applied equally throughout the country and consumers in the North were impacted just as much as consumers in the South.

The cotton and tobacco economy of the south gained nothing from the protective tariffs.

Sure they did. They benefitted on the 2 cent per pound tariff on raw cotton, the tariff on tobacco products, the tariff on turpentine and naval stores.

The South had lost the political clout to put in place a funding solution more to their benefit...

A funding solution like what?

...or to put a stop to the spending on transportation projects that primarily supported the west and northeast.

Transportation projects like what?

263 posted on 08/13/2020 10:53:15 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Transportation projects like what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_improvements

A funding solution like what?

Since the majority of our federal revenues don't currently come from tariffs, apparently there were other possible solutions.

266 posted on 08/13/2020 1:13:33 PM PDT by Wissa ("Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson