Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mbrfl
Nevertheless, I would expect Barr to follow the 60 day rule even if he isn’t legally required to. And it’s better for our side if it comes by Sep. 4th. That gives plenty of time for it to sway voters against the dems. Should be fun to watch.

I concur.

Why give the derps a talking point, even if its not technically or legally accurate.

Just give us some badass indictments that will be enough to destroy the democrats. The stink will affect them all. Then he can do mop up after the election.


480 posted on 08/13/2020 1:20:55 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

I should clarify. I think any indictments from Durham will come before Sep. 4th. But I still have a sneaking suspicion that we will see arrests soon after the election, and maybe even some on election day. This is based on my reading of Q, which could be wrong. I’ve been wrong before. But in one of the early Q posts he mentions Podesta being indicted on 11.3. Also mentions Huma being indicted on 11.6. I think Durham is just the opening salvo. But I think it will have a significant effect on the election.


484 posted on 08/13/2020 1:42:40 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

#480 Imho the only way this goes down is if Durham and/or Barr issue indictments and announce plea deals for people like Clinesmith.

If it is just indictments it becomes pure politics immediately.


822 posted on 08/13/2020 3:34:15 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson