Here are thtee unassailable points of logic that RINOs, leftists, the deep state and New World Order types always run from:
Point 1. The adjective natural in the phrase natural born Citizen must not be superfluous and without contributing further significant restrictive meaning to the phrase it modifies, therefore a natural born Citizen must be a significantly restricted subset of born citizen (citizen at birth). Clearly the two phrases (citizen at birth and natural born Citizen) must mean significantly different things with the latter being a restrictive subset of the former. To suggest otherwise is insulting to the deliberate, articulate elegance of the Founders who meticulously crafted the Constitution over weeks and months.
Point 2. The Founders wrote the Constitution in simple, everyday language meant to be understood by the ordinary citizen. Words mean things and natural means of or by nature as opposed to of or by man. The only type citizen whose citizenship does not depend on mans law is a natural born Citizen. All other citizen type are citizens by law, i.e., statutory born citizens.
Why does a natural born Citizens citizenship depend on no law? Because they are an inherent 100 percent American solely by the nature (that word again) of their birth circumstances. When one is born in the territory of the USA to two 100 percent USA citizen parents, one is by inherent nature a 100 percent USA citizen because no other outcome is possible, so no law is needed.
Point 3. Three inherent characteristics at birth are generally considered to contribute to citizenship and to ones natural allegiances, these being: the citizenship of ones father, the citizenship of ones mother and the land of ones birth (normally where one is raised). The Founders explicit stated purpose of restricting the presidency to only natural born Citizens was to provide a strong check to prevent the republic from falling prey to a presidency (and military) subverted by foreign influence and intrigue. It strains all logic and common sense to beyond credulity to suggest that the Founders would believe that a strong check would be provided by requiring just one of these characteristics (the least restrictive combination) rather than all three (the most restrictive combination).
bla bla bla.
Dont care.
YOU take action to force her off the ballot. If you do i will cheer you on...
Your birther doctrine may be 100 percent perfect. But it will probably have zero effect on any outcomes here.
Obama was installed twice.
The ship has sailed. Vattel was not on it.