Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Redwood71
And as NBS (sic) has never been defined and determined to be a point on its own, can mean anything so the only point in the phrase that pertains is “all persons born.”

PLEASE! Don't play that stupid game!
Anchor Baby

Direct link...4 Supreme Court Cases define "natural born citizen"
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

138 posted on 08/13/2020 12:38:09 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

https://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
In this case, Wong Kim Ark, the son of 2 resident Chinese aliens, claimed U.S. Citizenship and was vindicated by the court on the basis of the 14th Amendment. In this case the Justice Gray gave the opinion of the court. On p. 168-9 of the record, He cites approvingly the decision in Minor vs. Happersett:

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen#:~:text=The%20phrase%20%22natural%2Dborn%20citizen,be%20a%20natural%2Dborn%20citizen.&text=649%2C%20anyone%20born%20on%20U.S.,citizen%2C%20regardless%20of%20parental%20citizenship.

Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/

U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

No. 18
Argued March 5, 8, 1897
Decided March 28, 1898
169 U.S. 649

Syllabus:

A child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States, by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution:

“All person born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

She’s a citizen at birth, she can be president.

rwood


140 posted on 08/13/2020 1:38:54 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson