Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: norsky

from the linked article of inventor of RT-PCR, Kary Pullis...

” In China, generally, they diagnose ‘Corona’ with CT scans and one or two positive PCR tests. In the US, it’s difficult to find out what makes a “case,” ie what the case definition is. Absent CT scans, we are in a bio-tech free-fall. One website offers this distressingly unclear definition: “The novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has been spreading worldwide, resulting in growing numbers of infected individuals since late 2019 and increased mortality numbers since early 2020. So far, experts have seen that while there are severe cases, the infection is usually mild with non-specific symptoms. And there are no trademark clinical features of COVID-19 infection.” “

The RT-PCR test positivity depends on the number of cycles they do...36, 37, 40. The more cycles, the higher the amplification of the viral particle, the more likely of getting a positive. Different countries use different cut offs, hence positive rates across countries are not comparable. Also, the initial viral particle to run the PCR off of is from SARS, not coronal virus —so what are the tests actually detecting.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/?s=09


1,427 posted on 08/06/2020 12:00:47 PM PDT by smileyface (I LOVE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1265 | View Replies ]


To: smileyface

Covid IS a SARS virus, it’s SARS-CO-V2.


1,433 posted on 08/06/2020 12:04:24 PM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1427 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface
The RT-PCR test positivity depends on the number of cycles they do...36, 37, 40. The more cycles, the higher the amplification of the viral particle, the more likely of getting a positive. Different countries use different cut offs, hence positive rates across countries are not comparable. Also, the initial viral particle to run the PCR off of is from SARS, not coronal virus —so what are the tests actually detecting."

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/?s=09

Wow, this is nuts. Running pandemic by the seat of your pants.

“We need to quarantine everybody who’s positive. Next step. We need to do social isolation. It’s a mathematical model. And at the end you always win, right? So, in the end, the good guys win, and the pandemic is defeated. But there’s, there’s never been like an actual real pandemic since they built this machine. So, there’s this huge machine, it’s got a red button on it and it’s like if you ever detect a pandemic starting, you press the red button. We don’t know exactly what happened, but I think the Chinese government was embarrassed cause they were being accused of covering up a pandemic. They said, okay, you know, we want Western approval for our medical system so we’re going to press the goddamn red button. Or they did. And then everything followed from that. The problem is that the simulation was never based on reality.”

In another part of our conversation, he said something unforgettable:

“So, we’ve essentially been taken over by the medical Taliban, if you like.”

I pressed him one last time: “David, in conclusion, finish this sentence: “The PCR test for Corona is as good as…”

His reply made me laugh. I didn’t know I still could laugh.

“It’s as good as that Scientology test that detects your personality and then tells you need to give all your money to Scientology. “

1,492 posted on 08/06/2020 1:22:19 PM PDT by norsky (<img src=""></img><img src=""></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson