Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gubamyster; Rusty0604

It didn’t seem real. Could a former professor I once trusted as a mentor have betrayed his word, profession, and country to start these disasters? I had moved to England to pursue an academic career and leave DC’s politics behind, only to have my PhD supervisor throw me back into the most outrageous political firestorms I could imagine. Just my luck. Then an even worse question began nagging at me. Did I unintentionally light the match that started it all?

The person writing this article was a Doctoral candidate at Cambridge working under Stafan Halper. So Halper was his former professor and possibly mentor. He had worked in politics in DC.

In these discussions I stressed that Flynn was indispensable. He was perhaps the only campaign advisor who both had Trump’s personal trust and the deep intelligence experience necessary to expose hidden problems in the intelligence community. At one point, I even recall telling Halper that taking Flynn out would be like “beheading” Trump’s team. I had no idea I had been unintentionally aiding a spy preparing the guillotine and helping lead Flynn to exactly such a beheading.

Whether and to what degree the Cambridge Four’s ((( Stefan Halper"the Walrus"/Christopher Andrew/Richard Dearlove/Christopher Steele)))individual acts were formally coordinated can likely only be proven by testimony under oath and reviewing phone records, emails, and documents — things government officials seem to have blocked the Cambridge Four and Halper’s FBI handler, Steve Somma, from for four years. Yet it would seem odd if four, interconnected individuals linked to a town thousands of miles from Moscow or DC, randomly took acts that fit together so perfectly to take down Flynn.

The next day, January 5, Strzok attended an Oval Office Meeting with President Obama, National Security Adviser Rice, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and FBI Director Comey. Among the topics were intercepted calls between Flynn and Russia’s Ambassador discussing sanctions. Strzok’s notes indicate Vice President Biden suggested that Flynn somehow violated a 216-year-old, possibly unconstitutional, and never successfully prosecuted, law called the Logan Act.

Cambridge Four, once again, have links that should be explored. It is demonstrably true that Halper knew Ignatius for decades, and he also bragged to me Ignatius was his press contact. Ignatius’ Post colleague, Robert Costa, was also Halper’s former student, and has described Halper as a “friend” he “had dinner with on many occasions.”

********************************

NIKK..Gub everyone should read this article. It fills in all the holes. Amazing...about time someone comes out with this....And Sally Yeats.."I don't remember."(mantra) of the White House meeting was about intelligence NOT charging Flynn with The Logan Act........SHE was lying through her teeth!!!


1,888 posted on 08/09/2020 11:13:03 AM PDT by STARLIT ("And those who were dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies ]


To: NIKK

Yes, it is a must reasd & hopefully I will also see his subsequent writings on the subject.


1,896 posted on 08/09/2020 12:50:56 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies ]

To: NIKK

It is disheartening that no one involved in the conspiracy to take down the President has been arrested, much less convicted.


1,910 posted on 08/09/2020 2:51:00 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson