To: WildHighlander57
At least they used 4000 participants - statistically relevant.
Get the sheep ready in the chutes...
The moderna Wuhan flu study I saw had all of 14 participants (half with side effects reported) in the largest group - not exactly statistically significant but good enough for political and journalist work.
787 posted on
08/01/2020 2:18:06 PM PDT by
eldoradude
(Boycott Chinese made goods)
To: eldoradude; Miss Didi
Courtney Love Cobain tweets: Hey . About my name in Epsteins address book , its creepy as fuck that Im in that thing I agree. I didnt know him , never met him , didnt know who he was. Apparently he collected celebrity phone numbers. The end . Hope he burns in Avīci hell. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Av%C4%ABci https://twitter.com/courtney/status/1287880759202570240?s=21
794 posted on
08/01/2020 2:30:24 PM PDT by
Melian
( Check yourself before you KeK yourself. ~ Melian)
To: eldoradude
eldoradude wrote:
“At least they used 4000 participants - statistically relevant.
Get the sheep ready in the chutes...
The moderna Wuhan flu study I saw had all of 14 participants (half with side effects reported) in the largest group - not exactly statistically significant but good enough for political and journalist work.”
Using 4000 people for a nonmedical study, and 14 people for a medical study, reeks of propaganda and an ulterior motive.
What business does a medical organization have doing a 4000-person study to see if people will take a medication before its available???
806 posted on
08/01/2020 2:58:34 PM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
To: eldoradude
I didn’t see a mention of the health of the “participants”.
Only says: “Accepts Healthy Volunteers:”
1,054 posted on
08/02/2020 11:20:52 AM PDT by
stylin19a
( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson