I’m starting to doubt Dershowitz’s innocence. But he seems to be in Trump’s good graces, so that’s puzzling. Then again a lot of people have been on good terms with POTUS (Bolton as an example) only to be revealed later that they were plants. I think sometimes Trump uses people for certain purposes, and allows them to believe that they’ve won his trust, when in truth Trump knows all about the skeletons in their closets.
"The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan)."
Kudos to Jesse Watters for having the guts to challenge his own guest, Gregg Jarrett. Watters was discussing the latest on the Maxwell case with Jarrett. Jarrett’s narrative was that we should be cautious in believing the claims made by Virginia Giuffre. Fair enough. More evidence is needed to determine with certainty, the truthfulness of her allegations. But Jarrett went a little further, by suggesting the fact that she talked with the FBI for years about these allegations and yet the FBI never filed charges based on her allegations, makes her suspect. Are you kidding me Gregg? The FBI not prosecuting should be taken as evidence that no crime occurred? Do I even need to go into how absurd that statement is? As I mentioned, Jesse pushed back on that argument. I’ve never fully trusted Jarret, and this just gives me another reason not to.