https://twitter.com/3days3nights/status/1285762486344593409
The reason the Governors of Conservative States like Florida and Texas were playing the Mask Game was to also ensure their courts would rule AGAINST mandatory mail-in voting.
They were the initial test case to measure public sentiment before Trump “endorsed masks”.
~~~~~~~~~
I can’t say that I understand it well but here are two guesses.
For Trump’s defensive strategy, if he doesn’t endorse mask requirements then the Deep Staters try to “prove” voting in person is too unsafe around unmasked people and mail in voting is a “required” option for those who don’t want to risk death (!!) as some Dem had said, just to vote. If masks are required, then it’s safe to vote in person.
For Deep Stater’s defensive strategy, and given Trump has said that illegals are not permitted to vote, they may not want to be locked in to mail-in voting only, because it’s potentially easier to allow illegals or Dems to vote in-person (e.g., multiple times with multiple ID’s).
I’m vaguest about the Deep State strategy, but I suspect mail-in ballots require more traceable ID than do in-person voters who are waved in by corrupt polling staff. Or allowing both mail-in votes (ballot theft) and in-person votes (illegals walking in without ID or with shoddy ID) gives them both avenues to steal. I have to say, if I understand the Twitter post correctly, the reasoning just doesn’t appeal to me.
Further down the linked thread someone suggests that Trump and patriot Governor(s) suddenly pivoting to accept masks does away with the demand for mail-in voting. As if to say, “Dems keep saying masks work - okay let’s wear masks and vote in person because it’s safe with everyone masked.”
New Neon:
“It’s official, QFam.
Twitter has gone NUCLEAR on #QAnon. ICYMI the announcement, here it is, straight from the official “Twitter Safety” account:”
...
“Of course, what Bugman Ben, short-sighted as always, doesn’t realize is that this move by Twitter gives major legal ground for the DOJ to completely remove Section 230 protections from Twitter now. It’s become excruciatingly clear with this move that Twitter is anything but neutral, and is in fact acting as a publisher at this point.
So if @Jack and the likes of Bugman Collins want to take away Twitter from Q… I suggest the DOJ respond by taking Twitter away from the entire world.
All my readers should take a moment to message the DOJ and remind them of their imperative to protect free speech online, and remove section 230 protections from Twitter now that it is clearly engaging in mass censorship on a scale never before seen online, and to such an extent that it’s now become a danger to our national discourse to ignore it:”
“I also want to remind people of Q’s recent post regarding how we should organize in the wake of such fighting online:”
(from drop 4509 - to use other platforms)
“And I know what you’re thinking. “Oh great, he’s going to promote Gab again.” But actually, you’re wrong! I want to introduce the entire community to something brand new; something they haven’t seen before.
And that, my dear friends, is Ruqqus:
Remember how great a tool /r/GreatAwakening was on Reddit, before Reddit censored the entire sub from their site? Remember the massive reach the page had, and what a tremendous resource it was for sharing news and research?
And remember what a horror-show it was trying to move everyone to Voat? And how Voat was buggy and laggy and generally just had a crap user experience all-around?
Enter Ruqqus:”