Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

(h/t MAIRDIE)
1 posted on 07/14/2020 12:47:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
I find it quite “interesting” that the math exaggerations all go in one direction!

Absolutely no coincidences here - this was all contrived by different labs, using different test subjects, at different days, yet all report from upper 70% to almost 99%!

Sounds like election results in, say, Cuba, Venezuela or China!

2 posted on 07/14/2020 3:01:10 PM PDT by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
Commercial and government laboratories have to maintain various certifications that entail outside audits of their quality control. The scope of the audit starts when a sample first arrives into the lab’s legal chain of custody through storage and analysis to production of the analytical results for customer delivery.

I find it hard to believe that so many labs would be messing with their reporting in the way described. This would basically shut them down via temporary or permanent loss of certifications required to function and to get insurance. Opens them up to lawsuits and probably some criminal liabilities as well. My money is these funny numbers are being generated at the state and/or fed agency end.

Lab reporting of this type is computerized at the lab level. For that matter, individual samples are largely tracked by barcode and and most instruments report their data directly into the data system. Lab reports come in 3 flavors so to speak, ie. brief, standard and full. Brief has the results and key quality control summary, the standard report adds in additional quality control info. The full report includes the whole kitchen sink of quality control info and will make your eyes glaze over. I have tried using brief reports a few times just to make my job easier but even so, the labs strongly prefer using their standard format so I just end up with two stacks of paper to file. I limited requesting full reports unless lawyers were involved.

I’ll stop rambling now! Yea!

3 posted on 07/14/2020 5:21:23 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
I foresee some substantial information coming in 2-4 weeks on this curious skewing of Covid test data. Here’s a take on how this could develop.

The feds have on contract analytical lab auditors that periodically make unannounced visits to fed analytical labs across the US and world. The feds have labs all over the place. How this could come down is to pair an auditor with a FBI agent equipped with a search warrant. For a narrow scope audit such as this it would likely take a day or two to see what went on at the lab end if anything.

5 posted on 07/14/2020 6:23:19 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
I foresee some substantial information coming in 2-4 weeks on this curious skewing of Covid test data. Here’s a take on how this could develop.

The feds have on contract analytical lab auditors that periodically make unannounced visits to fed analytical labs across the US and world. The feds have labs all over the place. How this could come down is to pair an auditor with a FBI agent equipped with a search warrant. For a narrow scope audit such as this it would likely take a day or two to see what went on at the lab end if anything.

6 posted on 07/14/2020 6:28:19 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson