Q skeptics seize on one comment made by Q that hasn’t materialized (at least not yet) as proof that Q is a fraud. That’s a standard they would never require of anyone they support, nor would they hold themselves to such a standard. Do they believe POTUS is a fraud because Mexico hasn’t “paid for the wall” yet?. I assume not, nor should they. How many predictions have they made that didn’t come true? Do those predictions make them frauds?
There are many possible reasons for why Q’s advice to “Trust Sessions” hasn’t materialized. The “worst case” explanation is that something unexpected occurred regarding Sessions that even Q hadn’t foreseen. I’m not advocating for that being the case, merely pointing out that no person or entity, no matter how capable has perfect foresight. No matter how good a plan is, it will always encounter surprises during implementation. That doesn’t make it a bad plan or make those who are implementing it frauds. So the skeptics say if Q got it wrong about Sessions that means the whole operation is a fraud. They ignore the many accurate predictions that go well beyond chance, because unlike any other plan, if Q doesn’t have 100% perfect foresight it means Q is a LARP. Give me a break.
To Celebrate the Fourth, Michael Flynn Posts a Pledge to Conspiracy Group QAnon – Mother Jones
"Flynn had been circling the QAnon world for months, but this takes his flirtation with the group a step further. As the QAnon conspiracy theory goes, powerful liberal politicos are running an underground child sex trafficking operation but will ultimately be exposed and charged for their crimes after “The Storm.” There is, of course, no evidence that such a scheme exists."
No evidence? haha
I don’t think “Q” got it wrong about Sessions...up to a point.
The last time “Q” said “Trust Sessions” was april 2018. As of that date, “Q” was right.
Things sometimes change...