Aside from it will likely indict the character of several individuals being far short of what we expect to come from the Durham investigation, the promise of Graham to expect revealing results are likely already public knowledge.
From the Washington Examiner of March 23, 2020, Sen. Graham is quoted:
“So the thing that intrigues me the most is that in January 2017, the primary sub-source, a Russian, who prepared all of the information to go to Christopher Steele to go in the dossier, was interviewed by the FBI and the Department of Justice,” Graham said. “There were four people in the interview, and he basically told them, according to the Horowitz report, ’This is bar talk. It isn’t reliable. I never meant it to be used this way. I can’t believe you’re getting a warrant based on this document.’ The odds that these four people dealing with the most high-profile investigation maybe in the history of the FBI did not tell Comey, McCabe, and people higher up, I think are pretty low. But that’s yet to be established.”
So who was the source for this Russian disinformation contained in the Steele Dossier?
Dossier author Christopher Steele identified a former Russian spy chief and a top adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin as being involved in handling potentially compromising information about President Donald Trump, State Department notes show. In her notes, State Department official Kathleen Kavalec also referred to the two Russians — former Russian foreign intelligence chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Putin aide Vladislav Surkov — as “sources.”
Well, perhaps there is more to be revealed, but likely we are just going to learn how Steele and Bruce Ohr put one over on a few top folks at DoJ and FBI - names already known.
The Daily Caller identifies the 'sub-source' as Sergei Millian, a Belarusian businessman, connected with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
Sergei Millian