So it seems some, maybe many have become jury & judge here to condemn individuals and companies with no hard evidence, insinuation is adequate.
More pathetic is apparently you will turn on anybody who gives an alternate reason.
Be careful how you answer, I have been on this thread since day one, don’t use the “troll” excuse you throw at every poster who’s answer you don’t like, it has really become prevalent lately.
Lol never accused you of being a troll. Explain the intersection of highly overpriced items and the inclusion of the names of missing children. I might add names of a very unique nature. The use of their names alone is very odd.
judge and jury?
~~~~~~~~~
Posters here are reporting the news. This info is so odd that everyone is taking it with a grain of salt. We’re neither accusing or excusing. You shouldn’t either. You’ve offered a reasonable explanation for some BOOKS, but ..
You must admit, “The use of their names alone is very odd.”
Even if Wayfair is only the vehicle used by sicko, don’t you think the person or persons who put these weirdly named and priced items online would be shocked? Wouldn’t they bring that to the attention of superiors? No one is that obtuse.