Well sorry the kid has a concussion and nothing i said changes the fact the guy who did it is despicable or the fact that he did not bludgeon the kid. I repeat the act was heinous enough without the ‘journalist’ making shit up.
You are right, “bludgeons” implies that he had some sort of cudgel or weapon, he didn’t—he sucker-punched the kid, which would have been a more accurate headline.
But imagine the headlines if the races of attacker and victim were reversed.