Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

Why does the judge get to decide if the alleged malfeasance is sufficient to validate the petitions?

That means that if a judge is party-loyal to the mayor, no recall is ever possible.


3 posted on 07/04/2020 5:46:32 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine
That means that if a judge is party-loyal to the mayor, no recall is ever possible.
I guess you didn't get the memo from Chief Justice Roberts.

There are no Obama judges or Bush judges or Clinton judges etc.

8 posted on 07/04/2020 6:28:48 AM PDT by lewislynn ( It's not your color stupid, it's your attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The recall provisions in the Washington State Constitution and the court cases are such that there is no amount of malfeasance or misfeasance that the State Supreme Court would approve if the elected official is a Democrat or a liberal.

The law states that all doubts are to be in favor of the petitioner. In reality, all doubts go to the benefit of the office holder if the person is a Democrat or part of the Washington Deep State.

The Constitution need to eliminate the requirement that the courts determine if an elected official has violated their oath of office. Just allow people to petition for removal and then put it to a vote.


12 posted on 07/04/2020 8:25:58 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson