One way that the justices appointed by 0bola could be removed, when he is proven in a court of law to not have been eligible to hold the office of President (or Senator, for that matter), seems to relate to civil law but seems applicable although he’s not in the position any more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quo_warranto
In British and American common law, quo warranto (Medieval Latin for “by what warrant?”) is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right, power, or franchise they claim to hold.
Quo warranto today
In the United States today, quo warranto usually arises in a civil case as a plaintiff’s claim (and thus a “cause of action” instead of a writ) that some governmental or corporate official was not validly elected to that office or is wrongfully exercising powers beyond (or ultra vires) those authorized by statute or by the corporation’s charter.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/quo_warranto
Quo warranto
Definition
Latin for “by what warrant (or authority)?” A writ quo warranto is used to challenge a person’s right to hold a public or corporate office. A state may also use a quo warranto action to revoke a corporation’s charter.
Latin for “by what warrant (or authority)?” A writ quo warranto is used to challenge a person’s right to hold a public or corporate office.
**************
If the first strike is to indict Obama, and prove that he was not eligible to serve as President, and in so doing, cancel out all he did in office (including his SCOTUS appointments), the world would explode.
The indictment will need a point-by-point listing of how he betrayed our nation, and the world in general, and the compliance of the DNC, and MSM.
This would certainly bring about a massive storm.
Talk about “Darkness to Light”, and a Great Awakening.
That would remove Sotomayor and Kagan...
Also would affect whatever 5-4 or 6-3 decisions where they were 2 votes for - that would be very interesting - and should happen.