Cates makes a few mistakes (thousands/vs dozens with thousands, leaves out BOP in initial list etc, but the poitns are still valid.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another full Cates thread posted on the Q thread? Cates HATES Q.
Q tells us to think for ourselves. Cates despises all those who think Q is real and worth investigation.
For over a year, Q drops have been routinely re-interpeted away from their natural meaning to fit Cates' anti-Q theories. Why?
Why must Q content be contorted to fit the theories of someone who claims Q is not real?
After investing all those Q thread resources re-interpreting Q drops to force them to mean what Brian Cates' says, Cates' core theories were exposed as wrong.
Cates can't tell black hats from white hats; for almost 2 years he mixed them up and demanded his followers believe deep state black hats were secretly heroic white hats. With that fatal flaw in his reasoning, Cates' implicated the Trump administration in crimes they did not commit.
Nothing has happened to show that Cates has learned to tell hats apart.
When exposed, Cate's swept his followers' entire investment in him away with a breezy "Mea Culpa" and went on cranking out theories using the same broken logic as before.
Brian Cates doesn't know why he was so wrong and he doesn't care.
He never even genuinely apologized to all those he abused for doubting his magnificience, nor to all whose time and energy and patriotism was flushed down the toilet studying and sharing his flawed content.
Please - have mercy on me. Please link Brian Cates for who have their own reasons to keep him in their list of resources, and spare those of us who have our own reasons to avoid his massive, bloated posts. Please, I beg you.
He is the author of the story and interview of microchip trying to 'prove' Q was a fraud
I will only post Cates links per your request. I’ve never seen him express hate for Q. Could have missed such statements but never seen any.
Cates is very easy to understand once you accept that his only interest is building his followers on Twitter and enhancing his “reputation” as a political writer/pundit. He has delusions of grandeur, I’m old enough to remember when he often admitted he tossed newspapers on porches for a living, then got inspired to beg enough money through GoFundMe to write and blog full time.
He’s not stupid and wordsmithing is fine, but like many of his ilk, he’s constantly making wild assertions as if they were true when in fact they are just his opinion, and like Ann Coulter he has realized that being controversial and bucking the conventional wisdom is the way to get clicks (or sell books). He has no education or experience to enable him to independently make such statements and he freely admits his only sources are public information.
So I read what he says in the same way I read the Beetle Bailey comic strip...for entertainment.