Let’s assume Jessie’s theory is correct, that this was a “hit”. Yet the first autopsy results said Floyd did not die of asphyxiation, which is to say it wasn’t an intentional murder (hence the original charges). First question, why would they do that? Answer, because it’s the truth based on factual evidence.
Then everything blows up and political forces are applied. 2nd autopsy contradicts the first - why did they order it? Answer: because the first one didn’t provide the answer they wanted. Now Ellison is put in charge and the charges are elevated, and the other cops charged, which reinforces the narrative they want to push that it was a racially-motivated killing.
But back to Jessie’s theory. IF that is provable, it contradicts the narrative and exposes everything that’s happened since the initial autopsy and charges as blatantly political. It’s damned difficult to prove what was going on in someone’s head but providing a causal link through some other criminal activity that ties Chauvin to Floyd *might* be provable with hard evidence. It will be interesting to see, the possibility certainly cannot be dismissed.
I’ve considered a setup vs. a hit. If it was a “hit” per se then I don’t think one would have the cops do it in the street like they did - not to mention parading him around, having him fall on one side of the car (at the curb in one video) and on the other (if the reported story is to be believed), they wouldn’t be moving the police cars around, etc., etc. What would the purpose be of setting him up with a “counterfeiting” charge, etc.? They’d just off him and put him in the woods or something. Thus all those things appear completely contrived and STAGED. And that can be for only one purpose and be bigger than anyone might imagine. Make it international in scope and it becomes biblical. TBD + WWG1WGA :)