Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fatima
Ready. Fire. Aim. Twitter has abandoned it’s original explanation for labeling the President’s tweet. Yet it’s not removing the label. Instead, @jack claims the tweet could be read as making a different point that should be labeled for a different reason. What a mess.

Ready. Fire. Aim.

Twitter has abandoned it’s original explanation for labeling the President’s tweet.

Yet it’s not removing the label.

Instead, @jack claims the tweet could be read as making a different point that should be labeled for a different reason.

What a mess. https://t.co/rVp7BntJkk— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) May 28, 2020


838 posted on 05/28/2020 6:15:03 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies ]


To: fatima
Per our Civic Integrity policy (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/election-integrity-policy …), the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on @realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear.

Per our Civic Integrity policy (https://t.co/uQ0AoPtoCm), the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on @realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear.— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020


839 posted on 05/28/2020 6:16:53 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies ]

To: fatima

“Instead, @jack claims the tweet could be read as making a different point that should be labeled for a different reason.”

Mess indeed. Social media think they can install far leftists still pissed over losing 2016 to control information with no problem. What a jerk they put in charge of Twitter monitoring. I hope they pay the price and lose privileges they have abused.


845 posted on 05/28/2020 6:42:24 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies ]

To: fatima
Instead, @jack claims the tweet could be read as making a different point that should be labeled for a different reason.

Which is an even greater argument for PUBLISHER NOT PLATFORM!

881 posted on 05/28/2020 8:27:04 AM PDT by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies ]

To: fatima

@jack

Per our Civic Integrity policy (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/election-integrity-policy…;), the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on
@realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear.


912 posted on 05/28/2020 9:16:59 AM PDT by bitt ('Tyranny' is when you restrict the movement of healthy people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson