To be honest, I like to confront dumb-think wherever I find it. Being a FReeQ doesn't grant immunity.
Well .... Did you ever stop to think that may actually be a valid FReeQ position?
If it is, we're in trouble. Just so you know, I think about stuff. I have thought about your white hat theory since its inception. I have weighed it, measured it, and found it wanting. It sounds pretty, but I can't contemplate for one second that Trump set the whole thing in motion against himself.
So to answer your question, this theory SHOULD be a valid FReeQ position just as much as Barron is a time traveler and JFKjr is alive and working with the Q team and showed up at a Trump rally.
Did you ever stop to think how WEAK your argument must be if you resort to calling your fellow FReeQs "Dumb" and similar epithets?
Not at all. I find that I am capable of making a strong argument AND resorting to using epithets. In fact, the epithets make my argument more spicy and powerful.
Because I don't THINK I am dumb (but one never knows, does one?) ... but, I am quite certain that my fellow FReeQs of the White Hat persuasion (or keeping an open mind) are VERY FAR FROM DUMB.
Nah, I know you're smarter than me. Lots of people here are. I ain't so special. If you look back, you will find that I didn't call anybody dumb or stupid. I called you and their IDEA dumb, stupid, a clown theory, ridiculous, and maybe some more words.
People can be highly intelligent and have dumb ideas. Happens every day. Having dumb ideas is not a matter of intelligence. Its a matter of thinking that took the wrong off-ramp and ended up in dopey town.
Also, every single body on this thread and that pays attention to this thread is highly intelligent by default. It takes an expanded brain to even contemplate that Q exists.
But that doesn't preclude us from adopting dumb ideas and running with them.
Does it?
p.s.
I am quite certain that my fellow FReeQs of the White Hat persuasion (or keeping an open mind).
'Keeping an open mind' implies that you are open to anything being the truth. It implies that, after a careful examination of all the evidence, you can't make an educated decision as to the likelihood of the situation. It's a copout.
Its leaving yourself some wiggle room. I like to own my theories and yet leave some room for other possibilities depending on the probability of other truths and the introduction of further evidence. In this case, the probability that I'm wrong is so low that its not worth contemplating, and there is zero evidence to support your position.
