Say bitt didn’t ole San Fran sign an amended certification form in Hawaii for Bam Bam?
As I recall the Hawaii form was worded quite differently than the other fifty.
Or am I remembering it wrong?
San Fran Nan was the final word on the certification of Bozo. It’s all on her!
That’s why she is so desperate to get rid of our Pres. She was an enabler of this Treason.
As I recall the Hawaii form was worded quite differently than the other fifty.
Or am I remembering it wrong?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
you got it right - actually she sent in an amended form -
‘the DNC removed “constitutional eligibility” wording from its presidential nomination forms in 2004 and 2008.’
...”In 2008, after Barack Hussein Obama secured the Democratic presidential nomination, then-DNC Dhairman Nancy Pelosi signed the nomination certificates distributed to all 50 states, along with Alice Travis Germond, then DNC Secretary. A number of researchers thereafter noted that a different form was sent to the state of Hawaii, whose state statute requires that presidential candidates must affirm they are “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” to run seek the office.
An additional Hawaii requirement is the inclusion of “A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection…”
Instead, in 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party chose to substitute the required wording with the statement that Obama and Vice-Presidential candidate Joseph Biden were “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held on February 19th, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado.”
The 2008 nominating documents Pelosi and Germond signed have since been removed from Scribd. It is The Post & Email’s understanding that all states except Hawaii do not require a statement from the national political parties that presidential and vice-presidential candidates must be constitutionally qualified.
Hawaii law additionally provides for a process by which a presidential candidate outside of the two-party system whose “eligibility” is challenged can respond.
An investigation conducted by this publication in 2010 revealed that the DNC removed “constitutional eligibility” wording from its presidential nomination forms in 2004 and 2008. In 2004, U.S. Senator John Kerry ran for president alongside vice-presidential nominee and U.S. Senator John Edwards.” ......
see images
As I recall the Hawaii form was worded quite differently than the other fifty.
Or am I remembering it wrong?
You have it correct
And this little jem
There was the same typo on both copies....