If my understanding of Q comms is correct, Q often posts what anon's 'say' without comment. He let's the anon comment be HIS comment. Sometimes he posts an anon comment then refutes it or confirms it.
In this case, if Wray wasn't a sleeper, he would have refuted it directly or not posted the anon comment at all. But he did, and he didn't refute it.
Q replied, Future Marker. - meaning still TBD;
And this is where you go wrong. Q acknowledging that 'Wray is a sleeper' and saying it's a future marker is not him saying TBD. It's him saying that Wray being a sleeper will become an issue or be proven somehow in the future.
We've got to stop reinterpreting Q to fit what he says into our own personal pet theories. And we must stop pretending that Q didn't just say what our eyes tell us he did
(as example: the veritable metric tons of what he says about RR being a scumbag)
Trust Q, or why are we here?
Sorry, everyone, it’s been a busy day and I’m posting blind. I came across this twitter thread on a different FR post about Judge Sullivan, and it is chock full of all kinds of details about bad things the good judge has done. The tweet is from May 15, but I haven’t seen it mentioned here before. I admit to missing a lot of discussion lately, although I stay up with all the Q drops, so I may have just missed it.
I am just curious whether this has been looked into by anyone here or elsewhere, whether it is debunked or bunked. It is pretty horrifying if true. It would explain a lot, but I truly hope that there is no federal judge this horrifyingly evil.
Here’s the thread:
https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1261480070683688967