In case anyone wants to know, here’s a free online Meyer Briggs test. I’ve taken a few and this seems to be a regular one; altough I think I’ve seen better ones. Either I answered weirdly or the test computes differently, or I’m in a strange mood today, as it says I am INFP-A, I have no idea what the letter -A means, never saw that added. Usually my results have said INTJ.
https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test
Maybe ransomnote is correct (very likely!) that different mentalities/personality types just see things in a different way.
I think of it like a bicycle wheel with so many spokes. But they all connect up at the hub. So people can see the same thing, from different angles of vision.
And in the case of white/black/grey hats, until we know, we don’t know. Q knows. We aren’t in the “need to know” category of people. That’s what keeps it exciting... and....
WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL!
(They want to keep us divided!)
Thanks. Will take it right away and likely post thee results hh
Thanks.
Here:
PROTAGONIST
ENFJ-A i.e.. ASSERTIVE PROTAGONIST VS TURBULENT
MIND:
51% EXTRAVERTED
49% INTROVERTED
ENERGY:
60% INTUITIVE
40% OBSERVANT
NATURE
10% THINKING
90% FEELING.
[THIS ONE FEELS A BIT OFF FROM MY EXPERIENCE OF MYSELF. Most of those who know me consider me extremely analytical etc.]
TACTICS
60% JUDGING
40% PROSPECTING
IDENTITY
53% ASSERTIVE
47% TURBULENT
You are dead on, and thanks to RN and others who’ve kept this thread going, we have learned that we agree on vastly more than we disagree about, because in fact: WWG1WGA. Q has been a force for unity in a world filled with divisiveness and polarization. You can find plenty of examples on this very property of the opposite - just look out beyond the trees.
I used to do training for a volunteer crisis helpline and we had all the trainees take the Myers Briggs to help them better understand their own preferences, so they could be more able to learn the techniques we were about to teach them. It was very helpful because each person knew those aspects where more effort would be needed to overcome their natural tendencies. The MBTI is a pretty good tool for understanding others who are different than oneself, and realizing that’s OK, there’s no right or wrong, just differences.
You're right. That MB test seems to produce unusual results. I think the MBTT has been "new and improved" so many times by legions of sociology students over the years, that it's hard to determine its authenticity.
The Jung test seems reasonable.
Says I’m ISTJ-a
I have no idea what that means.