Ive been hard on Larry since Romney lost. I had really put faith in his prognostications and was absolutely crushed when Romney lost.
But lately, I have cut him some slack. His sources were probably correct. We DID elect Romney, but the Dems cheated and stole the election. I think this is why the leaders on both sides treat Romney like he has gravitas. However, I think Romney was a straw candidate and he always knew it. He played his role in the derp drama. They all knew Romney was slated to lose. Republicans included.
I still don’t care what Larry thinks these days, because he denies Q in the face of the thousand coincidences. Notice who ISN’T speaking against Q: POTUS, VPOTUS, Nunes, Jordan, Grassley, etc. I’d much rather be on their team than Larry’s.
I think LS writes the best history books around but his ability to predict future events is no better than anyones, and being ignorant of Q, actually somewhat worse than many.
His unfounded assumptions and childish impatience resulted in such a poor signal to noise ratio I unfollowed him. But I’ll buy and read his books, as his rear-view vision is 20/20.
I still don’t care what Larry thinks these days, because he denies Q in the face of the thousand coincidences.
********************************************************
Do you think these guys like, LS, Cates, Oswedo, etc., have to deny they follow Q? Do they think that if they give Q any credibility that they think it will hurt theirs in the long run? Maybe if they give Q any credence there would be no reason to read what they have to say. People would just wait for Q to post. Maybe it’s a ‘pride thing’.
Fitting, since Romney stole the primary...
He also blew chunks in his 2018 predictions...