My money's on that theory.
99.9% probability.
What if the fisa’s were backfilled. In other words they tried to cover up when Trump won the election? They never thought she would lose. So they just spied. Paper work after the fact.
My money's on that theory.
99.9% probability.
What if the fisa’s were backfilled. In other words they tried to cover up when Trump won the election? They never thought she would lose. So they just spied. Paper work after the fact.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Could be. But signing things like that implicate them in crimes so it’s an iffy strategy. But they do fake things all the time.
Rod Rosenstein claims the FISA he signed was not what was recorded. Welp, he’s lawyer so he’s gonna have an excuse, right? But admitting he signed one of the FISAs at all, regardless of whether he did so chronologically back in time or “back filled” it, would make him ineligible to serve as DAG appointing a Special Counsel or overseeing the Mueller investigation (he can’t oversee an investigation into his own actions signing the FISA), so if they back-filled with signatures, people who signed kinda shot themselves in the foot and tied themselves to treasonous actions. But yeah - they may have done that.
Could be. But signing things like that implicate them in crimes so it's an iffy strategy. But they do fake things all the time.
Rod Rosenstein claims the FISA he signed was not what was recorded. Welp, he's lawyer so he's gonna have an excuse, right? But admitting he signed one of the FISAs at all, regardless of whether he did so chronologically back in time or "back filled" it, would make him ineligible to serve as DAG appointing a Special Counsel or overseeing the Mueller investigation (he can't oversee an investigation into his own actions signing the FISA), so if they back-filled with signatures, people who signed kinda shot themselves in the foot and tied themselves to treasonous actions. But yeah - they may have done that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When I wrote the above response. I had just been reading an old Q drop, back when Q stated RR must recuse or be forcefully terminated. RR took office April 26.
Q1433 21 May 2018
RR must recuse or forcefully terminated.
[RR] problems.
What was RR's Senate Conf Vote?
WRAY reports to RR [important fact].
Who do you TRUST?
[RR] recuse/fired who has direct oversight of Mueller?
Sessions un-recuse or #3 [until refill]?
Who is Rachel Brand?
Why was Rachel Brand dismissed?
Think timing.