I may be beating a dead horse.
But, the Qmap site heading for the drop adds Obama as the king. Nowhere in the Q drop itself is that mentioned.
The site admins added it. This may be misleading a whole bunch of patriots, anons and FReeQs.
Only time will tell, even if I am wrong, it remains true that Qmap is NOT Q.
Yeah, I use qagg.news. The Qmap.pub ‘Titles’ are often interpretations.
This is a true fact.
But in Bagster world, THE KING in that Q drop represents Obama, without question.
Q was explaining why Lindsey Graham wasn't going after Obama (THE KING) at this time. Later explained by Barr and Q #4281.
(partial)
Objective [end]: checkmate king
Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game?
Do you attack and remove pawns first?
Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next?
Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end?
Is the game being played public or private?
Do emotions affect critical thinking?
Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]?
Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]?
“At this time.”
The anons who set the titles on qmap.pub get it right almost every time, you ask me.
But sometimes they do get it wrong, to be sure. Just not this time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I feel exactly the same way, Kalam. No outside comms.
That being said, I finally gave in and started using Qmap because in other ways it is more robust than the other aggregator sites, and easily lets me get back and forth over the whole Q history.
I consciously try and ignore the headings.
Kalam, what’s the frequency? Headings are apparently edited by the Qmapsite to give a reference to the tweet. Did they mess up the title? I am going back to 4281 to take a look. I really pay no attention to those titles I look AT THE q