Link
Posted on 05/17/2020 10:59:11 AM PDT by ransomnote
Nancy was likely taking when she tried to infect POTUS at SOTU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
can you imagine the reaction in the general public if that were ever proved true?? Even Dis’ relatives (and mine) would have to join the pitchfork/tar posse.
New Cates thread
I just did a long thread responding to one of my long-time followers who just demonstrated to me that despite all my best efforts, the fake narrative that “the statute of limitations will run out and save all these SpyGate plotters” is winning.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1262772902379827200.html?refreshed=1589904655
Her head on a breaching humpback with the tooth prominent.
These are great for such a ‘big’ target.
Thanks. I’ll defer to little jeremiah.
My usual go-to is Dr Mercola . com
I think that’s:
drmercola.com
Thanks. Was guessing in that direction but hadn’t quite made it that far.
New Cates thread (unrolled)
I just did a long thread responding to one of my long-time followers who just demonstrated to me that despite all my best efforts, the fake narrative that “the statute of limitations will run out and save all these SpyGate plotters” is winning.
So I’ll try HARDER.
Let me explain yet again why this “statute of limitations” narrative is not true.
It made big news when DOJ announced it was declining to charge first Comey and then McCabe for lying under oath to federal investigators back in 2015.
Statute was about to run out, so yeah.
The basic facts are thus:
Both Comey and McCabe were caught in multiple lies regarding criminal leaks they did during the Clinton email server investigation in 2015.
The clock was ticking down last year on the charging decision about that particular perjury.
The DOJ decided not to charge, announcing about Comey early in 2019 and McCabe much later in the year, in the winter.
Conservative pundits far and wide freaked out about it, assuming this means all the SpyGate plotters are getting a pass on everything they did.
Well here’s BACKGROUND:
Statute of limitations on federal perjury is 5 yrs.
How many times did they lie to federal investigators in 2016, 2017 and 2018? When’s the statute apply?
Statute of limitations on disclosing classified documents is 10 yrs.
If you leaked in 2015...?
Like a whole lot of people, I watched Conservative pundits tear their hair out and throw a tantrum because the DOJ decided not to pull the trigger on the SpyGate indictments last year to ensure that Comey & McCabe did a few months for their 2015 perjury about Clinton’s emails.
Somehow, through some amazing mental process I can’t figure out, people think this gives Comey & McCabe a pass on the far more serious crime they committed in 2015: leaking classified information to the press.
They in no way have gotten a pass on that.
People also seem to think giving Comey & McCabe a pass on their 2015 perjury in the Clinton email investigation means they **also** will get a pass on the rampant perjury to federal investigators they committed in 2016, 2017, and 2018 about RussiaGate and FISA abuse.
Nonsense.
We know BOTH Comey and McCabe are under investigation for criminal leaks of classified information.
So they skated only on serving a few months for the perjury they did in lying ABOUT the classified leaking they committed.
Some people can’t make the distinction. I can.
DOJ declined prosecution of McCabe for perjury he committed in 2015 when he frequently lied under oath to federal investigators about leaking classified info to the media because the statute was about to expire anyway.
DOJ has **NOT** declined to charge McCabe for that LEAKING.
I seem to be 1 of the only commentators who understands how this actually works.
Statute of limitations saved McCabe from a perjury charge for lies he told the OIG investigators back in 2015?
Well lucky him!
But the clock is still TICKING for the CRIME HE WAS LYING ABOUT.
You know who else understands what I’m telling you here right now, and understands it quite well?
The people at Judicial Watch understand it.
Why haven’t they gone over this?
They really should.
Anyway, back to the subject at hand.
The statute of limitations for disclosing classified information is 10 years.
McCabes out of the woods for the criminal leaking he did in the 2015 Clinton email investigation in [checks card] 2025.
Would anyone like to dispute that?
McCabe is not out of the woods yet and the statute of limitations isn’t even CLOSE to saving him on all the perjury he committed in 2017, 2018 and certainly not for all the criminal leaking he did in 2015, 2016 and other things we’ll be seeing soon in his indictment.
New Q
How about a nice game of chess.
https://thechessworld.com/articles/middle-game/chess-strategy-what-do-you-need-to-know-about-strategy-and-tactics/
Objective [end]: checkmate king
Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game?
Do you attack and remove pawns first?
Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next?
Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end?
Is the game being played public or private?
Do emotions affect critical thinking?
Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]?
Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]?
“At this time.”
Q
Link
North Carolina DEM Governor Roy Cooper caught in FLA escaping lockdown in his own state to get $$$ at personal fundraiser: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kF8ZicWnTzw
Don't recall having this many problems (last few days) opening Links Q posts until now?
"Perhaps #HillaryClinton thinks she can run out the clock on our efforts to get to the bottom of her scandalous email schemes. Recall that she is resisting, through an emergency appeal, a court order to us about her emails," @TomFitton in Breitbart. Read: https://t.co/bfqcI0Fped— Judicial Watch 🔎 (@JudicialWatch) May 19, 2020
and DrAxe.com DrAxe provides helpful menus and tips for maladies.
POTUS daily ingest HCQ prevent COVID-19?
Pre announcement: tools [source(s), data, COV-1 v COV-2 analysis, etc.] provided to factually ‘challenge’ narrative?
Full attack v HCQ by media [D]s?
Why?
Why wouldn’t the media [D]s want to work [on all fronts] to find a possible solution [immediate dismissal]?
Why doesn’t the media [D]s want the pandemic [rearrange: dem panic] to slow-stop?
Why doesn’t the media [D]s want society to heal [recover]?
Why doesn’t the media [D]s want people to no longer fear going outside?
Why doesn’t the media [D]s want people to point the finger at China as the source?
Why does’t the media [D]s want people to return to work [normal daily lives]?
Who benefits the most?
Why does corp media [D] attempt to control us?
Why does corp media [D] challenge [attack] anyone who defies pushed_coordinated narrative?
Why does corp media [D] attempt to prevent [individual] critical thinking [public]?
Is this about the virus or something else?
Everything is at stake this election.
Q
4281 Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 19 May 2020 - 11:22:56 AM How about a nice game of chess. https://thechessworld.com/articles/middle-game/chess-strategy-what-do-you-need-to-know-about-strategy-and-tactics/📁 Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q
TXnMA
and DrAxe.com DrAxe provides helpful menus and tips for maladies.
—
Agreed. I forgot about him.
Yep. MSM is the mouthpiece for all of this. They push the idea that our President is our ‘Daddy’ and needs to correct all of the behaviors du jour.
Thank You.
“Tyrannogasm”
“I don’t think that one is gonna fly, sorry...”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, [THEY] subject us to it,
knowing we are helpless to call it what it is.
Just like we, as a nation, have such a hard time naming
Islanmic Terrorism.
Too bad. It’s hard to fight what you can’t name.
~Easy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.