Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

I am told...Flynn is the tip of the iceberg...this gets worse. "Adam you are looking at the foyer of a house that is a 20 bedroom mansion"— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) May 13, 2020


More: I'm told don't fixate on the requestor. It is possible these were just the accessor codes being used which is a grey area. For example Powers could have been used by Rhodes. Biden may have been his Nat Security Advisor...either way it implicates them.— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) May 13, 2020


1/2 A bunch of stuff...follow the thread: No report for 29, 30, or 31st of December is big! Only 2 reasons that date wasn’t listed. Either NSA didn’t intercept call and it was CIA, or that info is front of the grand jury and that person is either a target or a witness.— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) May 13, 2020


600 posted on 05/13/2020 1:48:50 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Didi

Got it, but still...why would the Treasury Secretary (Jacob Law) need to know about General Flynn? Nobody (other than his BOSS) is going to tell the SecTreas to ask for the unmasking, but what’s the relevance to Treasury?

And why would the Secretary of the Treasury direct FIVE of his direct reports to do the same? This sounds like a team assignment, but why separate requests instead of just sharing the information between themselves?

And of course the names that are redacted but yet the titles of the person remain are odd. Couldn’t anyone with access to government records come up with the names of persons who held those positions at that time?


617 posted on 05/13/2020 2:13:49 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Didi

Also, regarding Adam Housley’s comment: “I’m told don’t fixate on the requestor. It is possible these were just the accessor codes being used which is a grey area.”

WHOA! Full stop.

He’s just a TV yakker but the ability to unmask a US citizen who was caught incidentally on surveillance is NOT a small deal! Those access codes are not to be shared around and given to others like they were baseball trading cards.

They have to choose: Either they admit they personally did in fact make the unmasking request, OR they have to explain who they gave their access code to, and why.

And that better be made a federal felony damn quickly if it’s not already. Someone who knows the security laws ought to be able to say with certainty that allowing someone else to use your unmasking access code is a crime or not.


627 posted on 05/13/2020 2:21:05 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

1,358 posted on 05/14/2020 9:16:28 AM PDT by bitt (Much of our culture is intended to traumatize us, as traumatized people are easily controlled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson