Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Excuse_Me

That is a very good piece and a different read on that hearing when Sullivan seemed to blow his top. The thread writer notes how Van Grack was then forced to say that they weren’t charging Flynn for any other crime, no treason, no Logan Act, etc., thereby admitting there could be no basis in materiality for a false statements charge so arising. TBD + WWG1WGA :)


307 posted on 05/13/2020 8:02:12 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.

What emphatic can be done about Judge Sullivan’s outrageous crap re Flynn case?


311 posted on 05/13/2020 8:08:06 AM PDT by WaltStuart (Lord, God, please protect President Trump, family, Q-Team et al 1,000%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

Sullivan did blow his top also about Flynn & turkey while Flynn was working for the admin.

Turns out the prosecutor had to advise Sullivan it ended in 2016.
And then Sullivan apologized in the afternoon session and qualified his remarks as questions.

Do you really think sullivan was intentionally getting the feds to admit stuff on record?...I don’t see it.
I still think Flynn has to work hard not to get stuck with the guilty plea for the bogus FARA charge.


470 posted on 05/13/2020 11:47:36 AM PDT by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson