Yes, there is. It's a shame you have to ask.
I thought you would be smart enough to figure it out.
I'm only disappointed at my own high expectation of you.
“I’m only disappointed at my own high expectation of you.”
If you’re another one of those Qball losers I’m quite happy to be the object of your disappointment. I’ll try to struggle on through my day in spite of it.
L
My understanding of the "Q" movement is that the individual is to research things themselves to come to the truth of things.
Many people have misconstrued some of the things that have been written by Q. IMO, the whole "Trust Sessions" "Trust Rosenstein" issue is one of those things.
Whether or not all Q followers trust either of those men, as you imply, is questionable. Not all Q followers, as far as I've seen, trust either man.
To me, Q was saying that those two men could be trusted to act in their nature, that being the nature of the scorpion. (swamp dwellers)
They both stung POTUS in the middle of the river...acting in their nature...and the frog should have trusted that they would do so yet didn't.
This frog (POTUS), however, jumped to the bank before he got stung/drowned.
It really is that simple.