And if they can show malice was the intent, their actions become treason.
Treason would not be tried by a court in DC, but by a tribunal.
The question is, just how many would fall in that net, as it goes all the way to Obama. Cankles as well.
The coup plot obviously began under Obama, but it now appears it had fizzled out and they had nothing but an illegally edited 302 on Flynn for all their efforts.
Things only really got back in gear when Mueller was appointed by Rosenstein, and Sessions refused to intercept, as Special Counsels require evidence of an underlying crime to be legally initiated, and they knew they had none but did it anyway.
What we need now is documents or intercepts proving they (deep state coup players to be named in these docs?) knew they had no right to appoint the SC, which is where all the truly bad legal and media things were born.
That's false. Treason is tried in Article III Courts. There has never been an exception to that.
The barriers to trial in military tribunal for somebody not under UCMJ or designated a FOREIGN combatant are practically insurmountable.
Treason is almost impossible to prove. I believe it is the only crime mentioned in the Constitution. The Constitution also outlines what it would take to prove treason.
I do believe there was a Coup d’tat attempt by Obmama, Hillary, DOJ and the FBI (with help from the media).
I long ago gave up the hope we would see swift justice against the Democrats, but perhaps this will be one conspiracy too far for the Democrats.
Actually, the crime is "high treason", and, unfortunately in this case, high treason is excluded from the US criminal code by specific language in the Constitution.
Is see trial by tribunal the only way that a conviction can be secured against these traitors. Given the DC jury pool, I doubt that any of them can be convicted.