Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Northwestern History professor debunked central claim in Pulitzer-winning New York Times essay
Campus Reform ^ | 05/06/2020 | Jon Street

Posted on 05/06/2020 5:05:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: proxy_user

Yep. You can find his draft online and compare it to the final. Only about 40% of his draft survived the Continental Congress. The rest was either dropped, severely edited, or they substituted their own language.


21 posted on 05/06/2020 7:00:57 PM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; proxy_user
I see that those links (which I posted elsewhere a couple of years ago) no longer go to the right passages. Here are the quotations again with links that currently work:

"In November of 1770, the [British] Board of Trade advised the King and his Council to disallow Virginia's act imposing an additional duty on imported slaves...According to the Board of Trade, Virginia's assembly intended to prohibit absolutely the slave trade. Such an action, in the board's opinion, would damage the economy of Great Britain and the colony. The lack of new slaves necessarily would limit tobacco production and would in turn raise prices, reduce consumption, and ultimately diminish the Crown's revenue from the tobacco trade...The Privy Council accepted the board's recommendation..."[A Planters' Republic, 1996, citing Board of Trade to His Majesty, 23 Nov. 1770]

"...the burgesses requested that the King 'remove all Restraints on your Majesty's Governors of this Colony, which inhibit their assenting to such laws as might check so very pernicious a Commerce.' " [A Planters' Republic, 1996, citing Journals of the House of Burgesses, 1770-1772]

These requests by the Virginia House of Burgesses can be found in other sources too.

22 posted on 05/06/2020 7:08:03 PM PDT by GJones2 (Virginia tried to reduce or end the slave trade before the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lefty prizes are worth nothing. Maybe less.


23 posted on 05/06/2020 7:13:58 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Wake me when a prominent democrat actually gets prosecuted. ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; colorado tanker; Citizen Soldier; GJones2
“she made the claim that American colonists sought independence from Great Britain because “they wanted to protect the institution of slavery in the colonies.”

That statement could not be a more egregious lie. The charters they operated on from Britain demanded slavery and the one New England colony besides Virginia tried to abolish it, but had the law was nullified by the British. Between the Revolution and the Constitutional Convention, six of thirteen colonies abolished slavery.

Thank you GJones2 for great links.

24 posted on 05/06/2020 7:21:56 PM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

You’re welcome.


25 posted on 05/06/2020 7:27:47 PM PDT by GJones2 (Virginia tried to reduce or end the slave trade before the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

And good information yourself.


26 posted on 05/06/2020 7:33:27 PM PDT by GJones2 (American attempts to reduce or end the slave trade before the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

btt


27 posted on 05/06/2020 7:33:30 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Neo-cons are liberal Democrats who love illegal aliens and war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

I think it was the Second Continental Congress as a whole which insisted on removing the bit blaming the king for the slave trade, not Adams and Franklin, whose modifications of Jefferson’s original text were pretty minor.


28 posted on 05/06/2020 9:18:49 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Jon Street should not be confused with J Street.


29 posted on 05/06/2020 9:19:25 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pulitzer [the emphasis is on “pew”]


30 posted on 05/07/2020 11:20:46 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

Very interesting links!


31 posted on 05/07/2020 1:51:53 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson