As I said earlier, think out how everything would have gone if RR didn’t appoint Mueller.
How is evidence presented?
-SB
As I said earlier, think out how everything would have gone if RR didn’t appoint Mueller.
How is evidence presented?
-SB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RR would expose the fake fisas, missing 302, purchase and insertion of the dossier. THere’s a court case asserting 50 agents in the FBI acted improperly -there’s so MUCH CORRUPTION on so many levels. Hillary, the spying on Trump.
“As I said earlier, think out how everything would have gone if RR didn’t appoint Mueller.
How is evidence presented?”
Without Q, would we know any of this? Mule was appointed in May ‘17. Q starts in October ‘17. Q was not something they expected. They expected to have a free rein to mold the narrative their own way through their (should I say it?) “stooges” in the media. Without Q, the facts would never have seen the light of day.
For RR/BM to be white hats, they would have to have been told that Q was coming to make sure this coup would fail. I think that’s pretty much of a stretch.