Replies

I respect that and of course wasn’t aiming my remark at you personally. But you’d have to agree the degree of derogatory and abusive posts about RR have probably only been exceeded by those about Hillary and Obama. And there’s still not proof positive one way or the other, as SB reminded me. Let’s just say there is “exculpatory information” about RR as well, which has not been given anywhere near equal consideration. I hope in the end many of these things will in fact become clear, which will help us move on and make needed changes.

bigbob: But you’d have to agree the degree of derogatory and abusive posts about RR have probably only been exceeded by those about Hillary and Obama.

me: I would have said derogatory and abusive posts about RR based on what Q has said about RR and observation of RR throughout the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA hoas.

You: And there’s still not proof positive one way or the other, as SB reminded me. Let’s just say there is “exculpatory information” about RR as well, which has not been given anywhere near equal consideration.

Me: I cannot give exculpatory information equal consideration, or near equal consideration, if I have never been presented with it.

I wish to make the point that there seems to be an impression that those of us who thought RR was guilty based on direct Q content, observing his behavior throughout the Russia “probe”, and were making derogatory comments about him as a result, lack the objectivity of those who believed him to be Q “disinfo”. Those who thought RR was White Hat are, in commentary, apparently deemed more fair in their deliberations and willing to delay “judgement” instead of responding to ‘echo chambers.’ I disagree.

Yes. The truth will come out.

Let’s just say there is “exculpatory information” about RR as well, which has not been given anywhere near equal consideration.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I suspect perhaps we differ on terminology. I have seen alternative theories and speculation, but no exculpatory evidence.