OK, I’ll refrain from posting about RV for you. But the point is this guy has no relation to Q, but CORROBORATED what Q has been saying all along. “Bigger than you can possibly imagine”. That’s what the Q phenomenon is all about - thinking outside normal parameters and pushing the boundaries of dogmatic trappings.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Logical is part of the Q movement. ANyone wishing to gain credibility for their remote viewing prowess can read Q and then claim to have corroborating evidence. It’s not dogmatic to want evidence of veracity, proof of efficacy. It’s wise to avoid escaping one (traditional) dogma only to leap into another (non-traditional) dogma.
Thank you for your willingness to support our Q threads.
As I said, the guy has no connection to Q. There's no indication he is a follower or is connected to any followers. This is absolutely no different that David Icke decades before Q telling us the same exact stuff Q is telling us now - sometimes with Q using the same phrasing. By that logic Q is copying Icke, which could be true, but it makes no matter to reality.