[ransomnote]

Early Q said Trust Wray.

And then there was puzzling behavior from Wray and a drop about "sleepers" which made me wonder if it might apply to Wray. Wray, Yates and now Rod Rosenstein all work(ed) for King & Spalding law firm - which puts Wray in with the wrong crowd. So if not a sleeper, then maybe Wray might be a Foucci or Brix - a corruptocrat being exposed. The press release isn't specific enough for me to  understand Wray's responsibility. That, by the way, is where Wray falls down the most. He has/had a duty to act in ways he has chosen not to act. I wonder about 'im.

Praying Medic has a good point, as always, but the "time frame" of 2016-2017 under "prior leadership" when the FBI supposedly handed over all docs was when Black Hats were in control and the FBI lies so thoroughly, so happily, and is wont to claim it gave "everything" when it hasn't. *cough*302s*handwritten notes*cough*

If Wray was an active white hat, I would have expected house cleaning and pro-active push for justice.

Christopher Wray:
From 2005 to 2016 he was a litigation partner with the law firm King & Spalding.

In 2018, Sally Yates, former United States Deputy Attorney General and Acting Attorney General, rejoined the firm’s Special Matters and Government practice group as a partner in 2018.

Rod J. Rosenstein, former United States Deputy Attorney General, joined the firm’s D.C. Office as a partner in 2020.

[HippyLoggerBiker]

Trump Live Now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXB6hWM8gZE&feature=youtu.be

[Metrobank]

I am not on the Trust Wray side. Certain law firms in DC are Deep State revolving doors. Covington and Burling being another law firm with Deep State partners (Eric Holder and my former classmate Michael Chertoff are both partners).

[little jeremiah]

I re-read this document a few times:

Document does not say when the documents were produced, but they were given to Horowitz and Durham, which means during Trump's time. The document to me says that the Flynn [bogus and illegal] investigation was done under prior leadership, ie 0bo0la's, but the documents could not handed over at that time, as they were handed to Durham and Horowitz.

I am wondering in what way Wray has/had a duty to act but has chosen not to. Wray has been very close mouthed about what is going on. To me, it is clear he does not hand over documents to Congress because of ongoing investigations, not because he's stonewalling.

Regarding "sleeper", it sounds derpish, but at the same time, I don't see any particular actions or speech from Wray that are derpish; and I also do not see why Trump would appoint a black hat to such an important position. And I also do not see any value in putting a black hat in such a position to "show" the public anything, such as seems to have been done (pretty clearly) with Fauci and Birx. F and B don't have any actual power, they were merely advisory, whereas Wray has a lot of real authority, which could be seriously misused if he is a derp.

The law firm stuff is unknown to me and afaic almost all law firms are definitely Bad! I suppose there might be a decent guy/gal lawyere here and there of course...