you are correct — when confronted with the same assumptions that the data Diogenes likes to trumpet in terms of overall cases and mortality rate and what it means— crickets. It is totally unbelievable.
This particular FEARPER is among the worst of the worst — attempts to sound erudite and data driven, but presents the data in a completely dishonest way and then chides other people for not understanding the genius provided. But it is telling that this FEARPER has never once responded to a data driven argument — because he or she cannot...either because he or she fails to understand HOW to analyze data or is to intellectually dishonest to assess the position her or she takes. Its like the New You SLIMES — above the fold front page story that falls apart — no worries, no retraction, or retract on page h -24 under the sears ad for the semiannual sale.
I thought most of the people on this website were somewhat mature.